Step 1 · Facts
Established, with documents.
Four kinds of work, with the fee basis agreed in writing and no outcome attached.
An opinion that only sets out the favourable argument is of no use to anyone making a decision. We set out the weaknesses too, and where a case is poor we say so early, because the cheapest advice anyone ever receives is being told not to litigate. Time limits are explained at the first meeting, since a right can simply expire.
Established, with documents.
The law as it applies.
Stated, not softened.
Including doing nothing.
What you actually need from this.
What is realistically achievable.
On terms you have approved.
Agreement reduced to writing.
Most disputes are better settled than tried, and a lawyer paid by time has an obvious incentive not to say so. We say it anyway: proceedings are slow, public, expensive and uncertain, and a reasonable settlement reached early is very often worth more than a better judgment obtained in three years.
Before proceedings start we set out what it will likely cost, what the court costs and procedural indemnity may add, and what happens if the case is lost. Clients are frequently told the first figure and not the second. An outcome is never promised: what is proved, what evidence exists and how a court applies the law are not ours to control.
Assessed before issuing.
Including the downside if lost.
Only on an informed decision.
Progress and changes of view.
What the arrangement must achieve.
With the risks marked.
Changes you have approved.
Knowing what you have agreed.
A contract reviewed before signature costs a fraction of the dispute it prevents, which is the least glamorous and most valuable work a lawyer does. Where a matter involves transactions of the kind the anti-money-laundering legislation covers, client identification applies — and we explain where that regime does and does not reach.
A free first meeting to establish whether we can act and on what basis.